Which cans contain bpa

Studies have also shown that BPA can narrow the coronary arteries, increasing risk for coronary artery disease. The dilemma you describe — organic can versus non-organic glass — can be resolved by asking the producer what is used in their cans, as some companies are using naturally derived linings, such as oleoresin, that may not present the same hazards.

He is the author of Sicker, Fatter, Poorer. Ask the experts: do the plastic linings of tin food cans contain BPA? We asked you what you wanted to know about your own toxic exposure and put your questions to Dr Leonardo Trasande Have a question about pesticides, persistent chemicals or heavy metals?

Ask the experts. Last updated: 07 August The facts BPA is a toxic chemical that can leach into foods from the lacquer lining of cans and from other food containers and bottles made from certain plastics. There's no reason to believe that we're less exposed to BPA now than in What is BPA? Is BPA dangerous? But the experts don't all agree For example, Dr Paul Brent, FSANZ's Chief Scientist, writes: "In today's world, [this] fear is often generated by published reports linking chemicals to various illnesses or effects and drawing assumptions about the relevance of animal studies to people.

The chemical industry defends BPA The chemicals industry typically argues that while there have been hundreds of studies on BPA, none has shown a direct cause-and-effect relationship between BPA and any human health effects. But as Richard Littlemore has pointed out in the New Scientist: "You can't beat doubt as a corporate strategy - especially if your product is life-threatening when used as directed.

Why it's bad for babies and kids Babies and young children are most at risk because of their small body weight and rapid growth.

Tamara Galloway, professor of ecotoxicology at the University of Exeter in the UK, writes: "There seems to be so much evidence of low dose effects and the perception that some scientists have had is that the industry regulators have ignored their evidence. These steps include: supporting the industry's actions to stop producing BPA-containing baby bottles and infant feeding cups for the US market, facilitating the development of alternatives to BPA for the linings of infant formula cans, supporting efforts to replace BPA or minimise BPA levels in other food can linings.

What's the local industry doing? Look for BPA-free products. More and more BPA-free products have come to market. Look for products labelled as BPA-free.

If a product isn't labelled, keep in mind that some, but not all, plastics marked with recycle codes 3 or 7 may be made with BPA. Cut back on cans. Reduce your use of canned foods, since most cans are lined with BPA-containing resin. Avoid heat. Experts advise against microwaving polycarbonate plastics or putting them in the dishwasher because the plastic may break down over time and allow BPA to leach into foods.

Use alternatives. Use glass, porcelain or stainless steel containers for hot foods and liquids instead of plastic containers. Latest Food and drink. What's the best spaghetti? Which Christmas fruit mince pies taste best? Artificial sweeteners vs sugar. How to use Vegemite in your cooking. Latest content. How to buy the best line trimmer. How we test wireless security cameras. How to buy the best freestanding oven. This coating protects the can from corrosion, and as a result, prevents contamination from dissolved metals or life-threatening bacteria.

We can probably all agree that nobody is hoping for a side of botulism with their holiday meal. BPA is also an endocrine disruptive chemical EDC , which can cause adverse health effects by interfering with how our normal hormone systems work, either by mimicking natural hormones or by altering their production or breakdown.

You may have seen many products touting that they are BPA-free. As a professor in food science and human nutrition, I recognize the long-held belief that the presence of certain additives in our foods can greatly affect the safety of our foods.

There is no question we need to develop the best possible scientific methods to assess whether these chemicals can cause adverse health effects. Others and I have tried to do just that. In fact, I was a coauthor of a report on the outcome of a workshop where more than scientists gathered in April to analyze data generated by the U. These scientists came from government, industry, academia and nonprofit organizations to collect the insights of multiple stakeholders who were involved in testing the effects of EDCs.

There is no question that we need to develop the best possible scientific methods to assess whether these chemicals can cause adverse health effects.

So, should you worry? For complex decisions such as whether to use BPA, a risk-and-benefit analysis can often shed light. In the case of BPA, the benefits are clearer than the risks.